Removing Dichotomy of Sciences The Integration of Islamic Sciences with Natural and Social Sciences, A Necessity for the Growth of Muslims [1] by Dr. M. Amir Ali, Ph.D. [2] Introduction. During the last few centuries a dichotomy of sciences has developed in the Muslim scholarship: deeni ("religious") sciences and dunyawi (worldly) sciences. Muhammad Muhsin Khan [3] in his translation of Sahih Bukhari frequently translates the Arabic word ‘ilm as “religious” knowledge. It is the opinion of this author that Muhsin Khan is a very poor translator and his translation of the Qur'an, which is distributed under the title, The Noble Qur'an, is one of the worst translations of the Qur'an done by a Muslim. A Muslim activist [4] in Pakistan who used to teach the meaning of the Qur’an in public gatherings, now lives in the U.K. and emphasizes that ‘ilm means only sciences of the Qur’an, Hadith and fiqh, whereas physics, chemistry, medicine, and engineering are not real sciences but funoon (arts). This dichotomy has developed, perhaps, because the Muslims see natural and social sciences coming from Europe, a land of kuffar (rejecters of Islam). Therefore, any of their contributions are mundane, not divine in origin. In general, Muslims consider that the only thing divine in origin is what is revealed to prophets and messengers. Since revelations to ancient prophets are not preserved except for whatever was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad, nothing qualified as ‘ilm except the Qur’an and Sunnah and whatever is derived from them. The consequence of such thinking is that the most honorable learning in the eyes of Muslims is to become an ‘alim (scholar) of the Qur’an, Hadith and fiqh – labeled collectively as “’Uloom al-Islamiyah” or Islamic sciences. The learning of natural and social sciences is considered a mundane activity propelled by greed to make money or gain prominent positions. Such thinking is against the teachings of the Qur’an and has reduced Muslims from a Super Power to the world’s most disgraced people due to their backwardness, illiteracy, poverty and weakness in every indicator of modern progress within the Islamic context. Furthermore, Muslims are not good in living by the Qur'an and Sunnah either, as shown by their ignoring of the Salat, Sawm, Zakat, and Hajj, coupled with their moral corruptness; an overwhelming majority is guilty of ignoring Islam. Due to the absence of Allah-consciousness (Taqwa) and absence of trust in Allah (Tawakkul 'al-Allah) they have become merchants of conscience and traitors as recent events have shown (2001-2002), particularly in Pakistan and Afghanistan. All True Knowledge is from Allah. Allah says in the Qur’an [5]:
This short verse conveys the message that all true knowledge was revealed (taught) to humankind by Allah. It is reasonable to conclude, therefore, that whatever was revealed by Allah to humankind is just as sacred as Qur’an and Sunnah. Especially when we find that Allah Himself commands mankind to reflect about His creation. Reflect upon the Creation and Signs of Allah. We read in the Qur’an:
The following questions may be raised from the study of the above given verses of the Qur’an:
Allah challenges mankind to reflect about himself and what surrounds him:
Efforts made to answer the questions above and many more arising from them would lead to research, experimentation, observation and discovery of the laws of Allah – that is science. Sometimes Allah will help in answering questions through inspiration and other times Satan will help by inspiring false ideas. Only time proves what is true and what is false. True knowledge is from Allah as He has declared it. It is said that the Qur’an is not a book of science but it could be a source of science for thinking minds. It touches many fields of science as signs of Allah, such as, astronomy, meteorology, biology, physics, engineering, geology, geography, cosmology, beginning of life on earth, anthropology, oceanography, psychology, linguistics, economy and others. Allah is calling people (mankind) who have been endowed with wisdom to reflect upon His creation. Allah takes the credit for himself for teaching mankind what he knew not. Whatever Allah teaches is good and sacred knowledge. The question arises about false theories which come and go. Do we accept any theory as God-given knowledge? The answer may be no. Allah has not given wisdom to all people at the same level, therefore, some people may be too quick in formulating theories while others may wait, collecting more information before proposing their theories. All correct theories are from Allah and false theories are from men themselves or inspired by Satan. It is a theory of this author that those scientists who believe in One God, irrespective of their religion, are rewarded by Allah for their sincerity in research, hard work and perseverance by inspiring them with true knowledge which then become their theories. Their Allah-inspired theories, in time, are accepted as laws of nature. For those scientists who did not believe in One God, they are not inspired by Allah but are inspired by Satan and, in time, are proven to be false. The theories which are eventually accepted are called laws of nature becoming a part of true knowledge and should be accepted as a part of divine knowledge. This is the knowledge revealed by Allah to mankind through His chosen human beings. However, every such human being is not labeled as a “prophet” or a “messenger”. Allah’s chosen prophets and messengers receive knowledge from Allah without any experimental work (let us call it “revealed knowledge”); however, they also reflect upon certain aspects of human existence and seek guidance from higher up before being chosen by Allah. Let us not get into the question of whether all prophets and messengers are born to fulfil a chosen role or if Allah chooses them in their adult life due to their unique qualities; an argument can be developed either way. The knowledge inspired by Allah to scientists may be called “experimental knowledge”, since their verification is in experimental observations. The application of “total knowledge”, which includes revealed and experimental knowledge, are interrelated. The experimental knowledge will be beneficial to the highest degree if it is utilized under the guidance of revealed knowledge, otherwise it may become a source of suffering. For example, an automobile is the product of true knowledge revealed by Allah but if it is used by a drunkard, the car may become a source of suffering. But if a car is used by a God-conscious person it may become a source of benefit and pleasure. Similarly, all products of science have beneficial or harmful effects depending upon the user’s makeup. Theories developed due to observations may remain suspended for a long time until proven to hold under all conditions, and only when such theories are accepted as laws of nature may they be accepted as a part of divine knowledge. There is another branch which I call “pseudo-knowledge”, such as astrology, magic, false theories, false religions and concepts which have no basis in experimental or revealed knowledge. Revealed knowledge given through prophets and messengers deals mainly with the truth about God, guidance of humankind in this life, humankind’s duties to God and His creation, and accountability in the life hereafter. This is called religion. When a religion is influenced by the Shaytan (Satanic influences) it is corrupted and becomes a source of harm and distress to humankind. In summary, the branches of knowledge may be defined as follows: Revealed Knowledge deals with the purpose of human life and it is given to chosen human beings by some special means by God, Allah. The persons who received such knowledge are called prophets and messengers of Allah and this knowledge was perfected during the lifetime of Muhammad, the last messenger. Experimental Knowledge is the result of observations, research, experiments, surveys and deep thinking after which God reveals the truth to his chosen human beings who may be called scientists. This method of revelation will continue until the last day of life on earth. Since such scientists are not a source of knowing the purpose of life, they are not qualified to be called prophets or messengers. Pseudo-Knowledge is assumed to be knowledge by ignorant people. However, it is not knowledge, but rather trickery to fool people and make money. Such pseudo-knowledge is astrology, magic and discredited theories such as Darwinism and neo-Darwinism. The source of pseudo-knowledge is the Shaytan (Satan). The interrelationship between various departments of knowledge is shown in Figure 1 given at the end of this article. Integration of Sciences: Integration of sciences means the recognition that all true knowledge is from Allah and all sciences should be treated with equal respect whether experimental or revealed. The definition of a scholar should be developed and applied to all equally. In our times a graduate of an Islamic madrassah may be equivalent to bachelor degree holder but he is instantly called an ‘alim (scholar). On the other hand, a bachelor degree holder in chemistry or economics is not considered an ‘alim (scholar). In the case of natural and social sciences, for a person to be recognized as a scholar he or she is expected to have a doctorate degree with research publications and a teaching background. It is not the same for a person trained in the Qur’an, Hadith and fiqh – why this double standard? Scholars of natural and social sciences are expected to keep up with new developments by taking continuing education courses and some among them have the fear of facing a malpractice suit. Many among natural and social scientists have to take a board examination before they can be licensed to practice their profession. Graduates of Islamic sciences have no board exams to pass for the rest of their lives and there is no malpractice suits for them; Islamic “scholars” have total freedom to issue all the fatawa they want with impunity, whether right or wrong. There is no professional board examination to pass for the Islamic “scholars”. There is a need for some deep thinking about the application of the term ‘alim. What criteria and qualifications must be met to be called an ‘alim? There is a need to raise the level of an ‘alim when applied to graduates of Islamic madarassahs (madaris in Arabic: Islamic seminaries). The matter of Aakhirah (the next life): When people need a doctor or a dentist or a car mechanic, they ask many friends and relatives before choosing one. If a “professional” messes up, it is a temporary loss or a set back. However, if an “alim” misguides people, whether due to his ignorance, sincere misunderstanding or mischievous reasons, the followers’ Aakhirah is ruined and it could be a matter of eternal damnation. It is suggested, therefore, that Muslims should have much more strict criteria for selecting an “alim” than selecting any other professional. Alas! In our time the criteria for selecting an “alim” is very loose and superficial. The curriculum for South Asian madarassahs was developed almost a millennium (ten centuries) ago in Baghdad for Madarassah Nizamiah under the Abbasids for the education and training of the bureaucracy of the caliphate and judges. One of the early rectors of Madarassah Nizamiah was Al-Ghazali. This curriculum was never meant to produce Islamic scholars. Islamic scholars were produced through education and training under the great scholars of the time over a period of several years, the way PhD’s are produced in our time at universities, and some among them go on to become scholars in their own disciplines. Madarassah graduates were trained mainly in fiqh Hanafi and social sciences; they had very little training in the Qur’an and Hadith as the graduates of madarassahs of our time are produced. Very few among them make a personal effort to become real scholars of Islam. In our time bureaucrats, lawyers and judges are produced in the modern universities; the madarassahs of our time produce neither bureaucrats nor scholars thereby rendering these schools useless, producing poor and mediocre imams for our masajid. These imams of masajid have neither knowledge nor training in contemporary issues, analysis of problems from the individual, family or national level. They lack vision for the Ummah and the world and are totally incapable of leadership. These are the reasons why the leadership for Islamic renaissance has been provided by self-taught scholars and those trained in social and natural sciences. Unfortunately, graduates of the natural and social sciences are kept ignorant of the Qur’an and Sunnah, except a few who are self taught in Islamic sciences, and graduates of the madarassahs are kept ignorant of natural and social sciences. This dichotomy of sciences should be ended. It is harming the Ummah. Graduates of madarassahs cannot find any work except in a mosque or religious teaching institutions and graduates of natural and social sciences are not able to provide even elementary leadership in religious areas, except a few. In addition, there is some mistrust and disrespect among graduates in each area for the other. Madarassah graduates are more populists and science graduates are more elitists and they sometimes look down upon each other. They have no common language to talk to each other; their jargons are very different. Each may have some arrogance yet may be envious of the other for different reasons. There is tension between the two groups that is not beneficial for the ummah. Political and economic power is in the hands of those who hold college degrees in natural and social sciences whereas the masses are in the grip of religious leaders. There was no such dichotomy during the early period of Islam, particularly during the first five centuries. During this period Islamic scholars were also physicians, philosophers, biologists, physicists, astronomers, etc. This was the period when Muslims were the super power of the world. As the leadership split, partial secularism was introduced in the Muslim society. This partition led the Ummah into weakness until it became the slave of their enemies (referring to the colonial period). The remedy is in ending the dichotomy of sciences and the raising new generations who will see all true sciences as God-given knowledge without any prejudice or sense of superiority of one over the other. Since Pakistan was established to be an Islamic country, it is suggested that Pakistan should begin to integrate the sciences. Some of the steps towards the integration of sciences are suggested below. Development of New Textbooks and Training of the Teachers. Science textbooks used now give all the credit of invention and discovery to those in whose hands they took place without any credit given to Allah. The matter of fact is that no scientist can discover or invent anything without help from Allah and textbooks should reflect this fact. Credit should be given to the scientist for his inquisitiveness, hard work, diligence, keen observation and perseverance but it is Allah who inspires in him the knowledge. For example, Newton saw an apple falling, he thought over the matter long and hard until Allah inspired him with the laws of gravity. This is the way Allah gave knowledge to mankind for progress. Conversely, Islamic studies students see no scientific signs (ayat) in the Qur’an and teachings of the Prophet. Many verses of the Qur’an touch science (a few have been quoted above) and they should be taught in the light of modern sciences. Maurice Bucaille [6] has collected in his book many verses of the Qur’an dealing with the sciences. Due to the ignorance of science on the part of translators and commentators of the Qur’an, many errors of translation and interpretation have entered into translations and tafaseer. For example, the term ‘alaq in the Qur’an (96:2) is frequently translated as clot or blood clot or congealed blood which is a gross error. A man of biological sciences will turn away from Islam if he is told that God created man from congealed blood in the uterus of the mother – it makes no sense to him. Islamic teachings are not dogmatic but rational, unlike the Trinity in Christianity which is an absurdity, rationally speaking, but must be believed to be a Christian. In Islam, the text of a Hadith “should not be (accepted if it is) against the dictates of reason, the laws of nature, or common experience.” [7] On the other hand if a verse of the Qur'an is not explainable in the light of experimental (scientific) knowledge it simply means that such knowledge has not advanced enough to explain it. Modification of Required Courses. It should be a requirement for Islamic studies students to take a few courses in the natural and social sciences. Conversely, natural and social science students must take some courses in Islamic studies. It is necessary for the raising of an enlightened generation of good thinkers and leaders in Islam for the Muslim world which will benefit the whole world. Optional Courses, Majors and Minors. There should be some cross-science majors and minors available for students. Those students majoring in chemistry or economics should be able to take a minor in Qur’an or Hadith studies. Conversely, a student majoring in any of the Islamic studies should be able to take chemistry or economics as a minor. In addition, all students should be allowed to take optional courses from any other department. Educating the “Educated”: There is an urgent need for educating religious “scholars” in elementary courses of social and natural sciences. On the other hand, graduates from the secular university system need to be taught elements of the Qur’an, Hadith, Fiqh, Seerah and Islamic History. Merger of Institutions. The long-term plan should be to do away with the separation of educational institutions. Islam-oriented universities in the Muslim world should take the lead by offering a full-fledged curriculum of Islamic studies which should far excel those offered at old style madarassahs and will bring the two types of institutions closer together, leading to their merger. A vision for the Ummah is needed.
[1] Originally presented at the Fiftieth Anniversary of Pakistan Conference held at SUNY College, Brockport, N.Y. on November 28-30, 1997. This is a slightly updated version of the same article. [2] Dr. M. Amir Ali is the Managing Director of the Institute of Islamic Information & Education, P.O. Box 41129, Chicago, IL 60641-0129, Tel. (773) 777-7443, Fax (773) 777-7199, Email: light@iiie.net. Webpage: www.iiie.net [3] Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan, THE TRANSLATION OF THE MEANING OF SAHIH Al-BUKHARI, Kitab Bhavan, New Delhi, 1987, vol. 1-9, [4] Major Muhammad Amin Minhas (retired), audiotapes of tafseer of the Qur’an, Islamabad, Pakistan. [5] In this article all Qur’an translations given are slightly modified versions of A. Yusuf Ali or Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall. [6] Maurice Bucaille, THE BIBLE, THE QUR’AN AND THE SCIENCE, American Trust Publications, Indianapolis, IN, 1979. [7] Muhammad Zubayr Siddiqi, HADITH LITERATURE, It’s Origin, Development & Special Features, The Islamic Text Society, Cambridge, England, 1993, p. 114.
|